Epic Radiant Practice Test

In peer reviews, when radiologists encounter concerning results, communicating with a chair or committee is essential for several reasons. This option ensures that the issue is escalated to a higher authority who can provide oversight and guidance on how to address the problem appropriately. Chairs or committees typically have the responsibility to evaluate concerns systematically, facilitate discussions about patient safety and quality of care, and implement necessary changes in protocols or practices. By engaging with these leadership structures, radiologists can help ensure that the issue is thoroughly investigated and addressed, ultimately contributing to improved patient outcomes and maintaining high standards of practice.

Other choices, although they may seem relevant in certain contexts, do not provide the same level of authority or structured approach to resolving a significant concern as engaging with a chair or committee does. For instance, notifying a resident or requesting a second opinion might be beneficial at times, but these actions might not lead to institutional changes or resolutions that a committee can facilitate. Informing a team leader is also important, yet their influence might be limited compared to the broader impact that can arise from involving a committee.